1. Home
  2. Vol 18, No 4 (2023)
  3. Yap

Development and Validation of Perception of Seating Ergonomics Questionnaire: A Study on Klang Valley Drivers in Malaysia

Choy Min Yap, Hanif Farhan Mohd Rasdi, Dzalani Harun, Wen Xin Lim

Abstract


Driving is an instrumental activity of daily living that has become an essential mode of transportation. Good ergonomic practices are vital to ensure successful driving. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire that could be used to determine how personal, environmental, and occupational factors influenced drivers' perceptions of seating ergonomics. This cross-sectional study was conducted in June-July 2022 among 250 drivers in the Klang Valley, Malaysia, recruited via an online survey. The participants completed the questionnaire by assessing different constructs in the Person-Environment-Occupation model and perceptions of seating ergonomics. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted, followed by a path analysis. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 30 participants. The final EFA generated a four-factor structure that accounted for 61.69% of the variance. The final version of the questionnaire contained 19 items. The Cronbach's alpha values for all the constructs were above 0.7, and all the intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.8. Based on the path analysis results, personal and occupational factors emerged as significant predictors for drivers' perceptions of seating ergonomics. The developed questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable.

Keywords


musculoskeletal disorders; occupational therapy; Person-Environment-Occupation model; psychometric properties; rehabilitation

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics (HFE)? Geneva: International Ergonomics Association.

  2. Khan Su, Khalifah ZB, Munir Y, et al. Driving behaviours, traffic risk and road safety: Comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2015; 22 (4): 359-367. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2014.925938

  3. Census and Economic Information Center. Malaysia Number of Registered Vehicles. Kuala Lumpur: Census and Economic Information Center; 2021.

  4. Masuri MG, Mohd Asib NA, Dahlan A, et al. Human Factors and Attitude towards Safe Driving Scale among Young Adults in Malaysia. E-BPJ. 2019; 4 (11): 203-209.

  5. Gowtham S, Ramnaath M, Sudharsan S, et al. Seating comfort analysis: A virtual ergonomics study of bus drivers in private transportation. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020; 912: 022018.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/912/2/022018

  6. Ho GW. Examining Perceptions and Attitudes. West J Nurs Res. 2017; 39 (5): 674-689. DOI: 10.1177/0193945916661302

  7. Yitayal MM, Ayhualem S, Fiseha B, et al. Occupational lower back pain and associated factors among taxi drivers in Mekelle City, North Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022; 28 (4): 2046-2051. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1952773

  8. AL-Dubai SAR, Qureshi AM, Ismail NH, et al. Prevalence and determinants of low back pain among taxi drivers in Malaysia. A cross sectional study. J Adv Med Res. 2012; 2 (4): 129-143.

  9. Mohamad D, Deros BM, Daruis DD, et al. Comfortable driver's car seat dimensions based on Malaysian anthropometrics data. Iranian J Public Health. 2016; 45 (Supple 1): 106-113.

  10. Wong C, Leland NE. Applying the Person-Environment-Occupation Model to improve dementia care. North Bethesda, MA: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2018.

  11. Hutchinson C, Berndt A, Gilbert-Hunt S, et al. Modified motor vehicles: The experiences of drivers with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42 (21): 3043-3051. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1583778

  12. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Safety and Health in Malaysia: Securing the Future. Selangor: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; 2021.

  13. Social Security Organization. Annual Report 2019. Kuala Lumpur: Social Security Organization; 2019.

  14. Department of Statisctics Malaysia. Big Data Analytics: National Occupational Accident and Disease Statistics 2021. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Economy; 2022.

  15. Pickard O, Burton P, Yamada H, et al. Musculoskeletal Disorders Associated with Occupational Driving: A Systematic Review Spanning 2006-2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19 (11): 6837. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116837

  16. Ikart EM. Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: An evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian J Soc Sci Stud. 2019; 4 (2). DOI: 10.20849/ajsss.v4i2.565

  17. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, et al. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 2015; 4 (2): 165-78. DOI: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017

  18. Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019; 11 (2): 49–54.

DOI: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

  19. O'Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, et al. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: Guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015; 1: 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y

  20. Beavers AS, Lounsbury JW, Richards JK, et al. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2013; 18. DOI: 10.7275/qv2q-rk76

  21. Tran TCT, Nguyen NT. Identify factors affecting business efficiency of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Vietnam. Manag Sci Lett. 2019; 9 (12): 1987-1998. DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.007

  22. Awang Z. Structural equation modeling using AMOS Graphic. Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan: UiTM Press; 2012.

  23. Sirajudeen MS, Pillai PS. Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire to assess the ergonomic knowledge of computer professionals. Int J Health Rehab Sci. 2015; 4 (4): 239-243. DOI: 10.5455/ijhrs.000000096

  24. Lombard K, Nolan C, Heron E. Refining the psychometric properties of the Trinity Student Occupational Performance Profile–A self-report measure of occupational performance difficulties within the student role. Brit J Occup Ther. 2022: 03080226221107762. DOI: 10.1177/03080226221107762

  25. Taherdoost H, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon N. Exploratory factor analysis; Concepts and theory. Adv Appl Pure Math. 2022; 27: 375-382.

  26. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018; 48: 1273-1296. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

  27. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15 (2): 155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

  28. Coluzzi P. Language planning for Malay in Malaysia: A case of failure or success? Int J Sociol Lang. 2017; 244: 17-38. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2016-0055

  29. Wollter Bergman M, Berlin C, Babapour Chafi M, et al. Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands-Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18 (23): 12282. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312282

  30. Ge Y, Sheng B, Qu W, et al. Differences in visual-spatial working memory and driving behavior between morning-type and evening-type drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2020; 136: 105402. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105402

  31. Deng M, Wu F, Gu X, et al. A comparison of visual ability and its importance awareness between novice and experienced drivers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2021; 83: 103141. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103141

  32. Karali S, Gyi DE, Mansfield NJ. Driving a better driving experience: A questionnaire survey of older compared with younger drivers. Ergonomics. 2017; 60 (4): 533-540. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1182648

  33. Xu J, Liu J, Sun X, et al. The relationship between driving skill and driving behavior: Psychometric adaptation of the Driver Skill Inventory in China. Accid Anal Prev. 2018; 120: 92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.032

  34. Chihuri S, Mielenz TJ, DiMaggio CJ, et al. Driving Cessation and Health Outcomes in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64 (2): 332-341. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13931

  35. Hughes BP, Anund A, Falkmer T. A comprehensive conceptual framework for road safety strategies. Accid Anal Prev. 2016; 90: 13-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.017

  36. Hakim S, Mohsen A. Work-related and ergonomic risk factors associated with low back pain among bus drivers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2017; 92 (3): 195-201.

  37. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016; 5 (1): 1-4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v18i4.6879

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.