1. Home
  2. Vol 18, No 2 (2023)
  3. Nurcahyani

Effects of Using an Application for Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Family Planning Counseling During Pregnancy

Lia Nurcahyani, Dyah Widiyastuti, Arief Tarmansyah Iman, Yanti Cahyati, Yeni Fitrianingsih

Abstract


A decision-making tool for family planning flipchart is used for contraceptive counseling, but the use of this flipchart is suboptimal. In this study, primary study resulted in innovative decision-making tools for family planning applications. “Si KB Pintar” was also developed, a tool that women can use to discuss contraceptives with their husbands after family planning counseling. This study analyzed the effectiveness of family planning counseling during pregnancy by applying postpartum contraceptive use. Analytical quantitative quasi-experimental methods were used with a control group design. The sampling method was two-stage sampling. In the first stage, from 22 primary health care (PHC) in Cirebon City, Indonesia, 11 intervention and 11 control groups were selected using random allocation. Five participants were taken from each PHC in the second stage using simple random sampling. The findings indicated that participants given family planning counseling using an application had a 2.4 times higher likelihood of using postpartum contraception compared to flipcharts after controlling for age and parity variables. Because these applications are only for Android users, applications should be produced that all users can utilize in further study.

Keywords


application; counseling; family planning; postpartum contraceptive

Full Text:

PDF

References


 1. World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

 2. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2020.

 3. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden (PERPRES) Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Menengah Nasional 2020-2024. Jakarta: Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia; 2020.

 4. Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk dan Keluarga Berencana Kota Cirebon. Catatan Kondisi Program Kependudukan, Keluarga Berencana, dan Pembangunan Keluarga (KKBPK) Kota Cirebon. Cirebon: Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk dan Keluarga Berencana Kota Cirebon; 2018.

 5. Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Laporan Kinerja BKKBN 2018. Jakarta: Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional; 2019.

 6. Family Planning 2020. FP 2020: Momentum at the Midpoint 2015-2016. Washington DC: United Nations Foundations; 2020.

 7. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan Ber-KB: Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan Ber-KB dan Pedoman bagi Klien dan Bidan. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2014.

 8. Herawati D, Wilopo SA, Hakimi M. Pengaruh Konseling Keluarga Berencana Menggunakan Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan pada Ibu Hamil terhadap Penggunaan Kontrasepsi Pasca Pernikahan: Randomized Controlled Trials. Ber Kedokt Masy. 2018; 34 (11): 411-415. DOI: 10.22146/bkm.8702

 9. Farrokh-Eslamlou H, Aghlmand S, Eslami M, Homer CSE. Impact of the World Health Organization’s Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers on the Quality of Family Planning Services in Iran. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2014; 40 (2): 89–95. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100290

 10. Pratiwi IGD, Huzaimah N, Indriyani R. The Effectiveness of the Use of Decision-Making Tools and WHO Wheel Criteria in the Selection of Contraception for Post Partum Mother. 2022; 4 (2): 197–203. DOI: 10.55018/janh.v4i2.98

 11. Widayati RS, Widagdo L, Purnami CT. Analisis Pelaksanaan Konseling Kontrasepsi oleh Bidan di Wilayah Dinas Kesehatan Kota Surakarta. Gaster. 2014; 11 (1): 78–87.

 12. Rokhmah J. Evaluasi Penggunaan Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan (ABPK) dalam Pelayanan Keluarga Berencana oleh Bidan Puskesmasdi Kota Cirebon [Theses]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2014.

 13. Nurcahyani L. Digital Decision Making Tool of Family Planning as a Media Innovation of Family Planning Counseling. J Ilm Bidan. 2020; 5 (2): 10–23.

 14. Herlyssa H, Mulyati S, Dairi M. Penggunaan WHO Wheel Criteria dan Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan (ABPK) dalam Pemilihan Kontrasepsi Pasca Persalinan. Jitek. 2014; 2 (1): 9–18.

 15. Goueth RC, Maki KG, Babatunde A, Eden KB, Darney BG. Effects of technology-based contraceptive decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227 (5): 705-713.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.050

 16. Nurcahyani L, Widiyastuti D, Hasan F, Cahyati Y, Badriah S. Development of Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Application: Feasibility Test According to Material Experts. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022; 10 (E): 720–724.

 17. Lwanga S, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health Studies. A Practical Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.

 18. Nove A, Matthews Z, Neal S, Camacho AV. Maternal mortality in adolescents compared with women of other ages: Evidence from 144 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2 (3): e155–164. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70179-7

 19. Restrepo-Méndez MC, Victora CG. Maternal mortality by age: Who is most at risk? Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2 (3): e120–121. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70007-5

 20. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2018.

 21. Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Laporan Survei Demografi Kesehatan Indonesia 2017. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; 2018.

 22. Siahaan A, Ariawan I. The Effect of Parity on Neonatal Mortality in Indonesia. JIKM. 2021; 12 (3): 250–260. DOI: 10.26553/jikm.2021.12.3.250-262

 23. Sonneveldt E, DeCormier Plosky W, Stover J. Linking high parity and maternal and child mortality: What is the impact of lower health services coverage among higher order births? BMC Public Health. 2013; 13 (SUPPL.3): S7. DOI:

1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S7

 24. Fitrianingsih ADR, Deniati EN. Unmet need for family planning and related difficulties among married women of childbearing age in Bandung Slum, Indonesia. J Public Health Africa. 2022; 13 (s2): 2-6. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2022.2398

 25. Hossain MB, Khan MHR, Ababneh F, Shaw JEH. Identifying factors influencing contraceptive use in Bangladesh: Evidence from BDHS 2014 data. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 192. DOI:

1186/s12889-018-5098-1

 26. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Pedoman Konseling Menggunakan Lembar Balik Alat Bantu Pengambilan Keputusan Ber-KB. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2021.

 27. Cavallaro FL, Benova L, Owolabi OO, Ali M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: What works and what doesn’t? BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 46 (4): 254–269. DOI:

1136/bmjsrh-2019-200377

 28. Puri MC, Moroni M, Pearson E, Pradhan E, Shah IH. Investigating the quality of family planning counselling as part of routine antenatal care and its effect on intended postpartum contraceptive method choice among women in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20: 29. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00904-y

 29. Adanikin AI, Onwudiegwu U, Loto OM. Influence of multiple antenatal counselling sessions on modern contraceptive uptake in Nigeria. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013; 18 (5): 381–387. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2013.816672

 30. Sznajder K, Carvajal DN, Sufrin C. Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study. Contraception. 2020; 101 (1): 21–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.007

 31. Freeman-Spratt GJ, Botfield JR, Lee GS, Rajiv P, Black KI. Understanding women’s views of and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023; 49 (2): 129-141.

 32. Reyes-Lacalle A, Montero-Pons L, Manresa-Domínguez JM, Cabedo-Ferreiro, Seguranyes G, Falguera-Puig G. Perinatal contraceptive counselling: Effectiveness of a reinforcement intervention on top of standard clinical practice. Midwifery. 2020; 83: 102631. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102631

 33. Akinola M, Hebert LE, Hill BJ, Quinn M, Holl JL, Whitaker AK, et al. Development of a mobile app on contraceptive options for young African American and Latina women. Health Educ Behav. 2019; 46 (1): 89–96. DOI: 10.1177/1090198118775476

 34. Lopez RG, Polo IR, Berral JEA, Fernandez JG, Castelo-Branco C.iContraception®: A software tool to assist professionals in choosing contraceptive methods according to WHO medical eligibility criteria. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2015; 41 (2): 142–145. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100966

 35. Kharbouch M, Idri A, Rachad T, et al. MyContraception: An Evidence-Based Contraception mPHR for Better Contraception Fit. In: Álvaro Rocha, Hojjat Adeli, Louis Paulo Reis, et al, editors. Trends and Innovation in Information Systems and Technologies Volume 3. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2020. p. 89-64. DOI:

1007/978-3-030-45697-9

 36. Hamad F, Akour A, Fakhouri H, Al-Daghastani T, Hamdallah E. Development of Mobile Application to Aid and Educate Healthcare Practitioners and Women to Select the Most Appropriate Method of contraception. Adv Res Stud J. 2020; 11 (5): 101-119.

 37. Habibi Z, Iskandar I, Desreza N. Hubungan Dukungan Suami dengan Pemilihan Alat Kontrasepsi di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kuta Alam Banda Aceh. J Health Technol Med. 2022; 8 (2): 1087–105. DOI: 10.33143/jhtm.v8i2.2356

 38. Becker S, Sarnak D. Experimental and Intervention Studies of Couples and Family Planning in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Oxford Res Encyclop Glob Public Health; 2022. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.372

 39. Al-Sheyab NA, Al Nsour M, Khader YS, Yousif H, Alyahya MS, Yaha H, et al. Midwives and women’s perspectives on family planning in Jordan: Human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics. Heliyon. 2021; 7 (8): e07810. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07810

 40. Yousef H, Al-Sheyab N, Al Nsour M, Khader YS, Al Kattan M, Bardus M, et al. Perceptions toward the use of digital technology for enhancing family planning services: Focus group discussion with beneficiaries and key informative interview with midwives. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23 (7): e25947. DOI: 10.2196/25947




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v18i2.6860

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.