Local Wisdom Enriching Complementary Feeding Practices during Disaster Situations in Indonesia

Astuti Astuti, Happy Hayati, Fajar Tri Waluyanti, Dessie Wanda

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze complementary food fulfillment during disaster situations in Indonesia since it frequently experiences natural disasters and young children face unique challenges related to their feeding needs in disaster situations. This qualitative case study based on the Mount Merapi eruption and Sumedang landslide in 2021 collected data using observations, forum group discussions, and in-depth interviews; then, a thematic analysis was conducted. This study involved 17 participants, including Non-governmental Organizations (NGO) activists, health workers, residents involved in making complementary foods, and primary caregivers of children aged 6–24 months. This study found that there were five themes generated from the data analysis; 1) the donation of home-based complementary foods based on local wisdom, 2) inadequate complementary feeding, 3) limited resources to manage the complementary feeding, 4) clean versus dirty conditions, and 5) mothers’ endeavour in complementary feeding practices. This study concluded that the complementary feeding practices during a disaster in Indonesia were supported by NGOs, residents, and nearby healthcare workers and thus represent a form of mutual cooperation among the Indonesian people.


Keywords


complementary feeding, disaster, local wisdom

Full Text:

PDF

References


 1. Yanuarto T, Pinuji S, Utomo AC, Satrio IT. Buku saku tanggap tangkas tangguh menghadapi bencana. Yanuarto T, editor. Jakarta: Pusat Data Informasi dan Humas Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana; 2019.

 2. Jati R. Longsor kembali terjadi, sebanyak 11 warga Sumedang meninggal dunia. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana; 2021.

 3. Jati R. Sebanyak 1.115 warga lereng Gunung Merapi masih mengungsi. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana; 2021.

 4. World Health Organization. Complementary feeding. World Health Organization; 2021.

 5. Astuti, Wanda D. Complementary feeding practices in the disaster situation: a literature review. J Per Indon. 2021; 5 (1): 558–75.

 6. Theurich MA, Grote V. Are commercial complementary food distributions to refugees and migrants in Europe conforming to International Policies and Guidelines on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies?. J Hum Lact. 2017; 33 (3): 573–7.

 7. Summers A, Bilukha OO. Suboptimal infant and young child feeding practices among internally displaced persons during conflict in eastern Ukraine. Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21 (5): 917–26.

 8. Marcantonio F di, Custodio E, Abukar Y. Child dietary diversity and associated factors among children in Somalian IDP Camps. Food Nutr Bull. 2020; 41 (1): 61–76.

 9. DeYoung S, Suji M, Southall HG. Maternal perceptions of infant feeding and health in the context of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. J Hum Lact. 2018; 34 (2): 242–52.

 10. Goudet SM, Griffiths PL, Bogin BA, Selim N. Impact of flooding on feeding practices of infants and young children in Dhaka, Bangladesh Slums: What are the coping strategies? Matern Child Nutr. 2011; 7 (2): 198–214.

 11. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications; 2014.

 12. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications. Singapore: SAGE Publications; 2018.

 13. Njatrijani R. Kearifan lokal dalam perspektif budaya Kota Semarang. Gema Kead. 2018; 5 (1): 16–31.

 14. Endro G. Tinjauan filosofis praktik gotong royong. RESPONS. 2016; 21 (01): 89–112.

 15. Pambudi KS, Utami DS. Menegakkan kembali perilaku gotong–royong sebagai katarsis jati diri bangsa. CIVICUS. 2020; 8 (2): 12–7.

 16. Gunardo G. Karakter gotong royong warga dalam menghadapi bencana lahar dingin Merapi di Kota Yogyakarta. J Pen Hum. 2013; 18 (2): 156–65.

 17. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Pedoman pelatihan konseling pemberian makan bayi dan anak (PMBA). Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2019.

 18. Osendarp SJM, Broersen B, Liere MJ van, De-regil LM, Bahirathan L, Klassen E, et al. Complementary feeding diets made of local foods can be optimized, but additional interventions will be needed to meet iron and zinc requirements in 6- to 23-month-old children in low-and middle-income countries. Food Nutr Bull. 2016; 37 (4): 544–70.

 19. Susanto T, Sulistyorini L, Yudisianto A. Local-food-based complementary feeding for the nutritional status of children ages 6 – 36 months in rural areas of Indonesia. Korean Journal of Pediatrics. 2017; 60 (10):320–6.

 20. IFE Core Group. Complementary feeding of infants and young children in emergencies. IFE Core Group. 2009: 223–51.

 21. Habibullah, Pudjianto B. Gotong royong pada program bantuan stimulan pemulihan sosial di Mamuju, Sulawesi Barat. Sosio Kons. 2014; 3 (2): 17–35.

 22. Beauregard JL, Bates M, Cogswell ME, Nelson JM, Hamner HC. Nutrient content of squeeze pouch foods for infants and toddlers sold in the united states in 2015. Nutrients. 2019; 11 (7): 1–9.

 23. Lutter CK, Grummer-Strawn L, Rogers L. Complementary feeding of infants and young children 6 to 23 months of age. Nutr Rev. 2021; 79 (8): 825–46.

 24. World Health Organization. Ending inappropriate promotion of commercially available complementary foods for infants and young children between 6 and 36 months in Europe. A discussion paper outlining the first steps in developing a nutrient profile model to drive changes to product. World Health Organization; 2019.

 25. Pries AM, Huffman SL, Mengkheang K, Kroeun H, Champeny M, Roberts M, et al. High use of commercial food products among infants and young children and promotions for these products in Cambodia. Matern Child Nutr. 2016; 12: 52–63.

 26. Pries AM, Filteau S, Ferguson EL. Snack food and beverage consumption and young child nutrition in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2019; 15 (S4): 1–11.

 27. World Health Organization. Information concerning the use and marketing of follow-up formula. World Health Organization. 2013; 119: 17–9.

 28. Demonteil L, Tournier C, Marduel A, Dusoulier M, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Longitudinal study on acceptance of food textures between 6 and 18 months. Food Qual Pref. 2019; 71: 54–65.

 29. Marduel Boulanger A, Vernet M. Introduction of new food textures during complementary feeding: observations in France. Arch Pediatr. 2018; 25 (1): 6–12.

 30. Solomon D, Aderaw Z, Tegegne TK. Minimum dietary diversity and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Equity Health. 2017; 16 (1): 1–9.

 31. Obaggy JE, English LK, Psota TL, Wong YP, Butte NF, Dewey KG, et al. Complementary feeding and micronutrient status: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019; 109: 852S–71S.

 32. Carothers C, Gribble K. Infant and young child feeding in emergencies. J Hum Lact. 2014; 30 (3): 272–5.

 33. Morintoh P, Rumampuk JF, Lintong F. Analisis perbedaan uji kualitas air sumur di daerah dataran tinggi Kota Tomohon dan dataran rendah Kota Manado berdasarkan parameter fisika. J Biom. 2015; 3 (1).

 34. Finnane JM, Jansen E, Mallan KM, Daniels LA. Mealtime structure and responsive feeding practices are associated with less food fussiness and more food enjoyment in children. J Nutr Educ. 2017; 49 (1): 11-18.e1.

 35. Bauer B, Hedlund C. Nurture project international: lactation work incrisis. J Hum Lact. 2018; 34 (3): 503–6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v17i2.5452

Refbacks