Factors Related to Cafe Worker’s Lung Capacity in Pontianak, Indonesia

Sunarsieh Sunarsieh, Felina Repelita, Zainal Akhmadi

Abstract


Exposure to cigarette smoke in public places affects the human population lung capacity. Cafe workers are a population susceptible to cigarette smoke exposure. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with the lung capacity of cafe workers. This study used an observational method with a cross-sectional approach. The sample was composed of 74 participants. Data collection was carried out by interviewing and observing respondents. Exposure to inhaled smoke was measured using interviews and a spirometer checking lung capacity. The Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between risk factors and lung capacity. The results showed a significant relationship between age (p-value = 0.006) and the lung capacity of cafe workers. The older person had, the greater the risk of decreased lung function. There was a significant relationship between cigarette smoke exposure, age, and the lung capacity of cafe workers. The intervention needs to be done to make a preventive measure by establishing non-smoking area regulations in public spaces and monitoring the workplace environment.

Keywords


cafe workers, cigarette smoke, exposure, lung capacity, workplace

Full Text:

PDF

References


 1. Ndjoulou F, Desmarais L, Pérusse M. Employer responsibility for occupational health and safety: challenges, issues, and approaches. J Manag Policies Pract. 2015; 3 (1).

 2. Mostafa N, Momen M. Occupational health and safety training: knowledge, attitude and practice among technical education

introduction: workers represent half of the world’s population.

Maintaining a safe working environment is reflected on a healthy

worker. Some reasons for n. Egypt J Occup Med. 2014; 38 (2): 153–

 3. Nankongnab N, Silpasuwan P, Markkanen P, Kongtip P, Woskie S. Occupational safety, health, and well-being among home-based workers in the informal economy of Thailand. New Solut. 2015; 25 (2): 212–31.

 4. Bhagawati B. Basics of occupational safety and health. IOSR J Environ Sci Ver I. 2015; 9 (8): 2319–99.

 5. Weinstock D, Slatin C. Learning to take action: the goals of health and safety training. New Solut. 2012; 22 (3): 255–67.

 6. Ulutasdemir N, Kilic M, Zeki Ö, Begendi F. Effects of occupational health and safety on healthy lifestyle behaviors of workers employed in a private company in Turkey. Ann Glob Heal. 2015; 81 (4): 503–11.

 7. Hämäläinen P, Takala J, Kiat TB. Global estimates of occupational accidents and work-related illnesses 2017. Work Saf Heal institute, Finl. 2017; 1–21.

 8. International Labour Organization. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases. World Day Saf Heal Work; 2015.

 9. Harris JE. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases. In: Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No 7. 1991 p. 59–75.

 10. Gibbs K, Collaco JM, McGrath-Morrow SA. Impact of tobacco smoke and nicotine exposure on lung development. Chest. 2016; 149 (2): 552–61.

 11. Öberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to secondhand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011; 377 (9760): 139–46.

 12. Asma S, Mackay J, Sophia Yang Song LZ, Jeremy Morton KMP, Bhatti DBL, Silva RCRCRCDVL da C e, et al. The GATS atlas: global adult tobacco survey. Global Adults Tobacco Survey. 2015; 112.

 13. World Health Organization. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Lyon, France; 2004.

 14. Nurjanah, Kresnowati L, Mufid A. Gangguan fungsi paru dan kadarcotinine pada urin karyawan yang terpapar asap rokok orang lain. J Kesehat Masy. 2014; 10 (1): 43–52.

 15. Dhatrak S, Nandi S, Gupta S. Comparative study of pulmonary impairment among diverse working groups in coal mine. Am J Prev Med Public Heal. 2018; 2 (1): 1.

 16. Novan N, Kalsum E, Lestari L. Pontianak coffee shop. JMARS J Mosaik Arsit. 2021; 9 (1): 243.

 17. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: ALFABETA; 2007.

 18. Forum of International Respiratory Societies. The global impact of respiratory disease. Forum of International Respiratory Societies. 2017 p. 5–42.

 19. Shrivastava SRBL, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Assessment of nutritional status in the community and clinical settings. J Med Sci. 2014; 34 (5): 211–3.

 20. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26 (2): 319–38.

 21. Association of Operating Room Nurses. AORN guidance statement: safe patient handling and movement in the perioperative setting. Reno D, editor. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses; 2011.

 22. Centers For Disease Control and Prevention. How tobacco smoke cause disease-what it means to you; 2010.

 23. Fadlilah S, Sucipto A, Aryanto E. Perbedaan kapasitas vital paruantara perokok dengan bukan perokok. J Ilm Keperawatan Stikes Hang Tuah Surabaya. 2020; 15 (1): 115–23.

 24. Bird Y, Staines-Orozco H. Pulmonary effects of active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure among adolescent students in Juárez, Mexico. Int J COPD. 2016; 11 (1): 1459–67.

 25. Saminan. Efek perilaku merokok terhadap saluran pernapasan. J Kedokt Syiah Kuala. 2016; 16 (3): 191–4.

 26. Sholihah M, Tualeka AR. Studi faal paru dan kebiasaan merokok pada pekerja yang terpapar debu pada perusahaan konstruksi di Surabaya. Indones J Occup Saf Heal. 2015; 4 (1): 1.

 27. Hasan H, Maranatha RA. Perubahan fungsi paru pada usia tua. J Respirasi. 2019; 3 (2): 52.

 28. Oviera A, Jayanti S, Suroto. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kapasitas vital paru pada pekerja industri. J Kesehat Masy. 2016; 4 (1): 267–76.

 29. Aini S, Saftarina F. Hubungan karakteristik individu dengan nilai kapasitas vital paru pekerja di PT. Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk Unit Tarahan Lampung. J Kedokt UNILA. 2017; 4 (2): 245–50.

 30. Kandung R. Hubungan antara karakteristik pekerja dan pemakaian alat pelindung pernapasan (masker) dengan kapasitas fungsi parupada pekerja wanita bagian pengampelasan di Industri Mebel X Wonogiri. J Kesehat Masy Univ Diponegoro. 2013; 2 (1): 18724.

 31. Ahmed T, Waqas M, Ahmed Zuberi S, Iqbal Q. Lung function comparison by the technique of spirometry between different working groups of Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey based study. RADS J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018; 7 (2): 97–106.

 32. Zheng X Yan, Li Z long, Li C, Guan W Jie, Li L Xia, Xu Y Jun. Effects of cigarette smoking and biomass fuel on lung function and respiratory symptoms in middle-aged adults and the elderly in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Indoor Air. 2020; 30: 860–871.

 33. Yuvaraj R, Suganya K, Chandrasekhar M. Pulmonary function test in coal handling workers. Res J Med Allied Sci. 2016; 1 (1): 100–6.

 34. Brennan E, Cameron M, Warne C, Durkin S, Borland R, Travers MJ, et al. Secondhand smoke drift: examining the influence of indoor smoking bans on indoor and outdoor air quality at pubs and bars. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12 (3): 271–7.

 35. Cao G, Awbi H, Yao R, Fan Y, Sirén K, Kosonen R, et al. A review of the performance of different ventilation and airflow distribution systems in buildings. Build Environ. 2014; 73: 171–86.

 36. Yamato H, Mori N, Horie R, Garcon L, Taniguchi M, Armada F. Designated smoking areas in streets where outdoor smoking is banned. Kobe J Med Sci. 2013; 59 (3).

 37. World Health Organization, Tobacco Free Initiative World Health Organization. Protection from exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke: policy recommendations; 2007.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v17i1.5344

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.