e-ISSN 2598-3849       print ISSN 2527-8878

Vol 5, No 2 (2020)

Sistem Pembayaran Mixed Method INA-CBGs dan Global Budget di Rumah Sakit: Tahap 1 Uji Coba Mixed Method INA-CBGs-Global Budget di Indonesia

Fachmi Idris, Atik Nurwahyuni, Mundiharno Mundiharno, Benjamin Saut, Citra Jaya, Wan Aisyiah Baros, Ayunda Oktavia, Dedy Revelino, Erzan Dhanalvin, Rasinta Ria Ginting



Tidak ada sistem pembayaran pelayanan kesehatan yang sempurna dalam penerapannya termasuk sistem pembayaran DRG (Diagnosis-Related Groups) yang lebih dikenal dengan nama INA-CBGs (Indonesia Case-Based Groups) di Indonesia. Beberapa negara yang mengadopsi DRG telah menerapkan kebijakan pembayaran mixed method DRG-Global Budget dengan variasi implementasinya demi menjaga kesinambungan sistem jaminan kesehatan nasional di negaranya. BPJS Kesehatan menginisiasi studi operasional penerapan sistem pembayaran rumah sakit mixed-method INA-CBGs dan Global Budget mulai tahun 2018. Terdapat tiga tahapan dalam uji coba sistem pembayaran rumah sakit mixed-method INA-CBGs dan Global Budget ini. Tahap pertama adalah Global Budget Tanpa Resiko yang bertujuan untuk menguji metode penghitungan global budget dan mengidentifikasi tantangan yang dihadapi bila kebijakan mixed method INA-CBGs dan Global Budget ini diberlakukan. Studi dilakukan di 5 (lima) kabupaten/kota di 30 rumah sakit (RS). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa metodologi penghitungan global budget yang diterapkan cukup akurat untuk memprediksi realisasi klaim di RS. Penghitungan global budget di tingkat kabupaten/kota lebih akurat hasilnya dibandingkan dengan menghitung global budget di tingkat RS karena mengakomodir shifting pasien dari RS yang satu ke RS yang lainnya akibat perubahan kapasitas RS. Perubahan kapasitas RS di tahun berjalan dan adanya pandemi COVID-19 menyebabkan adanya selisih antara penghitungan global budget dan realisasi klaim.


When it comes to provider payment system, no one shoe fits all including DRG payment system which in Indonesia are known as INA-CBGs. In some countries that used DRG have mixed it with Global Budget in various mechanisms to maintain the sustainability of the national health insurance system in their countries. BPJS Kesehatan initiated a three-stage pilot study on the implementation of the mixed-method hospital payment system INA-CBGs and Global Budget starting in 2018. The first stage is the Non-Risk stage which aims to test the accuracy of the global budget calculation and prediction and to identify the challenges faced when the mixed-method payment is implemented. The pilot was conducted in 5 districts in 30 hospitals. Initial results show that the calculation and prediction method is accurate to predict the actual hospital claims in the following year. The calculation of the global budget at the district level is more accurate than the hospital level because it accommodates patient transfer from one hospital to another due to changes in hospital capacity. Changes in hospital capacity in the current year and the COVID-19 pandemic requires some adjustments to the budget calculation.


Sistem Pembayaran, INA-CBGs, Global Budget


• Cots, F., Chiarello, P., Salvador, X., Castells, X., & Quentin, W. (2011). DRG-based hospital payment: Intended and unintended consequences. In R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, & M. Wiley, Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

• Fattore, G., & Torbica, A. (2006). Inpatient reimbursement system in Italy: How do tariffs relate to costs? Health Care Manage Sci.

• Francis, Mertens, I., Closon, M.-C., & Hofdijk, J. (2001). Casemix: Global Views, Local Action Evolution in Twenty Countries. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

• García, J., Gomez, J., Hidalgo, L., & Fernandez, J. (2004). Readmission rate as an indicator of hospital performance: The case of Spain. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

• Langenbrunner, J. C., Cashin, C., & O'Dougherty, S. (2009). How To M An Introduction to Provider Payment System. In , Designing and implementing health care provider payment system: .

• McIntyre, D., & Kutzin, J. (2016). Health Financing Guidance No 1; Health financing country diagnostic: a foundation for national strategy development . Geneva: World Health Organization.

• Mendez, C. M., Harrington, D. W., Christen, P., & Spellberg, B. (2014). Impact of Hospital Variables on Case Mix Index as a Marker of Disease Severity. Population Health Management, Volume 17. doi:10.1089/pop.2013.0002

• Murray, J. E. (n.d.).

• Murray, J. E. (2017, March 14). The CDI buzz about CMI: What your facility metrics mean. Retrieved from Association of Clinical Documentation Integrity Specialist : https://acdis.org/articles/guest-post-cdi-buzz-about-cmi-what-your-facility-metrics-mean

• O’Dougherty, S., Cashin, C., Samyshkin, E., Ibraimova, A., Katsaga, A., Kutanov, E., . . . Zues, O. (2009). Case Based Hospital Payment System. In J. C. Langenbrunner, C. Cashin, & S. O'Dougherty (Eds.), In Designing and implementing health care provider payment system: How To Manuals. . Wahington DC.


• Schreyogg, J., Stargardt, T., Tiemann, O., & Busse, R. (2006). Methods to determine reimbursement rates for diagnosis related groups (DRG): A comparison of nine European countries. . Healt Care Manage Sci.

• Vogl, M. (2012). Assessing DRG cost accounting with respect to resource allocation and tariff calculation: the case of Germany. Health Economics Review.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.7454/eki.v5i2.4819


  • There are currently no refbacks.