Evaluation of Program for Overcoming Intestinal Worm Infections among Children

Henny Febriyanti; Haerawati Idris

doi:10.21109/kesmas.v15i1.2737

Evaluation of Program for Overcoming Intestinal Worm Infections among Children

Henny Febriyanti, Haerawati Idris

Abstract

Prevalence of intestinal worm infection in generall is extremely high in Indonesia among the poor population with poor sanitation. One of the government programs to address this problem is the distribution of medicines to prevent intestinal worm infections. However, the coverage of the achievement for this program is still low in several areas of public health centers in Palembang. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the national program for preventing intestinal worm infections. The qualitative research design used evaluation model approach Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. This study was conducted in one of health centers in Palembang City. The informants were selected using purposive sampling method. Data collection was done via in-depth interviews, document reviews, and observations. Descriptive content analysis was used to examine and process the collected data. Results showed that, from situational factor, the program is held by the government because of the high prevalence of intestinal worm infection. The study found the input component, limited staff that handles this program. There were limited facilities for the extension of the infrastructure. In the process component, the distribution of the drug albendazole was not optimal in all elementary schools. Four elementary schools did not receive albendazole. This study demonstrated that the implementation of the program was not optimal

Keywords

drug distribution, evaluation, worm infection

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. World Health Organizations. Intestinal Worm [Internet] [cited 2018 Juni 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/intestinal_worms/more/en/

2. Dunn JC, Turner HC, Tun A, Anderson RM. Epidemiological surveys of, and research on, soil-transmitted helminths in Southeast Asia: a systematic review. Parasites & vectors. 2016 Dec; 9(1): 31.

3. Noviastuti AR. Infeksi Soil Transmitted Helminths. Jurnal Majority. 2015 Nov 1;4(8):107-16.

4. Sirajuddin S, Masni M. Kejadian Anemia pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal. 2015 Apr 1;9(3):264-9.

5. Kartini S. Kejadian Kecacingan pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Negeri Kecamatan Rumbai Pesisir Pekanbar. Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas. 2016 May 1;3(2):53-8.

6. World Health Organizations. Soil Transmitted Helminth Infection. [serial on the Internet] [cited 2018 Juni 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections

7. Hanif DI, Yunus M, Gayatri RW. Gambaran Pengetahuan Penyakit Cacingan (Helminthiasis) Pada Wali Murid SDN 1, 2, 3, dan 4 Mulyoagung, Kecamatan Dau, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur. Preventia. 2017 Nov 14;2(2).

8. Juhairiyah J, Annida A. The Policy of Helminthiasis Control and Public Knowledge Againts Helminthiasis in Banjar Regency South Kalimantan Province. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2014;17(2).

9. Marlina L, Widjaja J. Hubungan pendidikan formal, pengetahuan ibu dan sosial ekonomi terhadap infeksi soil transmitted helminths pada anak sekolah dasar di Kecamatan Seluma Timur Kabupaten Seluma Bengkulu. Indonesian Journal of Health Ecology. 2012;11(1).

10. Kementerian Kesehatan RI 2017. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No. 15 Tahun 2017 tentang Penanggulangan Kecacingan. Jakarta; 2017.

11. Widoyoko EP. Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2009.

12. Nugrahani F, Hum M. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books; 2014.

13. Syafrudin SK, Kes M. Organisasi dan Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Kebidanan. Jakarta: Trans Info Media; 2009.

14. Tarwoto, Wartonah. Kebutuhan Dasar Manusia dan Proses Keperawatan. Jakarta; Salemba Medika; 2010.

15. Moleong LJ. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2010.

16. Maulana HD, Sos S, Kes M. Promosi kesehatan. Jakarta; EGC; 2009.

17. Azrul A. Pengantar Administrasi Kesehatan. Edisi Ketiga, Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara; 2010.

18. Ryadi AL. Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta; Penerbit Andi; 2016.

19. Yandana NA. Efektivitas Kerja Sama Koperasi Syariah Ben Iman Dengan Yayasan Yatim Mandiri Dalam Program Bunda Yatim Sejahtera. Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya; 2014.

20. Saleha MF, Satrianegara M. Buku Ajar Organisasi dan Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan serta Kebidanan. Salemba Medika, Jakarta; 2009.

21. Fajar, N.A. Modul Mata Kuliah Perencanaan dan Evaluasi PKM. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat. Indralaya: Universitas Sriwijaya; 2010.

22. Wijayanto D, SPi MM. Pengantar manajemen. Jakarta; Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2013.

23. Wibisono S, Munawaroh S. Sistem Informasi Manajemen Puskesmas (Simpuskesmas) berbasis Cloud Computing. Dinamik. 2012;17(2).

24. Isma SL, Sudaryanto S, Halleyantoro R. Evaluasi Program Pemberantasan Kecacingan pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Puskesmas Rowosari Kecamatan Tembalang Semarang. Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro. 2019;7(2):551-61.

25. Mustari M, Rahman MT. Manajemen pendidikan. Jakarta; Raja Grafika Persada; 2014.

26. Mubarak A. Model Impelementasi Program dalam upaya pencapaian sasaran MDGs. 2015 (Strategi Bagi Birokrasi sebagai Ujung Tombak Implementasi 8 Sasaran MDGS). [cited 2018 Juni 1]. Available from:http://repository.ut.ac.id/2402/1/fisip201206.pdf

27. Imron, A. Implementasi Kebijakan Kesehatan “LIBAS 2+” Sebagai Upaya Menurunkan Angka Kematian Ibu dan Bayi di Kabupaten Sampang. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia.2013; 2(3): 107 – 111.

28. RI DK. Sistem kesehatan nasional. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor. 2009;72.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v15i1.2737